Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Heaven By Way of Mars


According to followers of some religions, they will go to heaven when they die (supposedly because they got into the gods' good books because they 'believed in Him').

That's why their obituaries in the papers are littered with claims like 'called home to be with the Lord'. In fact, they are 'a dime a dozen' - you find them all the time. Cheap thrill.

But I have yet to see an obituary that claim that some one had been 'called home to be with the Lord by way of Mars'. That would be something to brag about, wouldn't it?

Which is why this woman below has my respect...

First woman in space Valentina Tereshkova wants to go to Mars

Russia News.Net Wednesday 12th June, 2013

Russian cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova, the first woman to go to space, said that she willing to make a one-way trip to Mars.



The 76-year old made the statement in Zvyozdny Gorodok (Star City) outside Moscow, home to a cosmonaut training centre, adding it is her favourite planet, reports News.com.au.
Tereshkova, who became a national heroine at the tender age of 26 when she made a solo space flight in 1963, said that she had been part of the group who studied the possibility of going to the Red Planet. (ANI)

- See more at: http://www.russianews.net/index.php/sid/215137125/scat/723971d98160d438/ht/First-woman-in-space-Valentina-Tereshkova-wants-to-go-to-Mars#sthash.WoRJLAEP.dpuf

Friday, February 22, 2013

The Satisfaction of Just Following What Great Minds Do

This 95 year old man is still drawing satisfaction from reporting on the devalopments and achievements of science. Amazing.

Remember Pareto Principle: Only a few people truly makes a difference to this world - in this case, it is increasing our understanding of the natural world. Follow what they do. The rest (which is the majority) are close to irrelevant.

For those of us who cannot do what those scientists do, just following their findings and theories is a source of satisfaction.

p.s. This old man used to write his reports on an Olivetti typewriter. I remember my elder sister bought one of that when I was about 15 when she started some secretarial course after high school. It was the first time I saw a QWERTY keyboard and spent some time practicing typing from there - "asdf ;lkj" was the first lesson from my sister's typing book. Also, remember how precious even paper was then - made sure every inch of space was used up! I typed my own song book on that typewriter - no money to buy song books so copied selected songs from song books borrowed from friends. Mankind has gone a long way in that 35 years but QWERTY remains...





February 21, 2013, 6:10 p.m.

SAN FRANCISCO — David Perlman had two deadlines on his mind as he elbowed his way through the Exploratorium, cane in one hand, notebook in the other.

As the San Francisco Chronicle's veteran science writer, Perlman has been covering the granddaddy of hands-on science museums since it was just a glimmer of an idea in the fertile mind of physicist Frank Oppenheimer, the "uncle of the atom bomb."

Now, after 43 years in the elegant but drafty Palace of Fine Arts, the museum was getting ready to close before moving to new digs on the Embarcadero, and it was Perlman's job to chronicle the last day in its original home.

So the first deadline was his own — 6 p.m. to make the next day's paper with a front-page story. The second belonged to the woman tagging along behind him.

She's "doing a story about the oldest living reporter — me," Perlman told the amused museum staff. "She has to be done before I die."

Science and journalism have come a long way since Perlman picked up a fountain pen and began to write.

He was born in 1918, a decade before the discovery of penicillin. Pluto had yet to be discovered, let alone demoted. The ballpoint pen was invented the year he got his first real newspaper gig, a 1938 summer job covering cops in upstate New York.

Perlman can't remember the name of the now-defunct publication, but he sure can recall his first story, a jailhouse interview with a prostitute that began something like this: Pretty Kitty Kelly sobbed in her cell at Schenectady County Jail last night.

"It was atrocious, but it was the kind of thing you did," said Perlman, who learned his craft in the glory days of the New York tabloids. "That kind of journalism no longer exists."

Some might quibble with Perlman's premise (think coverage of Lindsay Lohan, Casey Anthony, Kim Kardashian), but one thing cannot be denied: It is the rare journalist who has cranked out stories as long and as skillfully as the dapper dean of science writers.

Perlman turned 94 in December, closing out a year in which he wrote 111 stories. Although only 0.2% of America's full-time workers are 80 or older, he has no plans to slow down.

He has shrunk a bit in recent years, but the cane is more for his three children's peace of mind than his own safety or mobility. He's about to turn in his outdated flip phone for a newer, smarter model. A Twitter lesson is in the offing. His driver's license is up to date.

After all, he said over a burger at a South of Market dive near Chronicle headquarters, "I'm doing exactly what I wanted to do all my life, be a reporter."

Perlman credits his mother for a journalism career that has spanned nearly eight decades and included stints at the Bismarck Capital and the European edition of the New York Herald Tribune and 63 years at the Chronicle.

Sara Perlman took her son to see "The Front Page" — probably the Broadway version, which premiered in 1928, but possibly the 1931 movie. Perlman the nonagenarian can't remember which; Perlman the boy was smitten either way.

The motley crew of Chicago reporters portrayed in the comedy were waiting to view a public hanging. Perlman remembers them as "seedy, catatonic Paul Reveres, full of strange oaths and a touch of childhood. I thought, 'What a romantic characterization.' I wanted to be that."
Shortly thereafter, he started his first newspaper. At summer camp.

He now bears the title of "Chronicle science editor." Prizes for science and medical writing named in his honor are awarded each year. But writing about the physical world did not come naturally to the Columbia University graduate.

After six years covering everything from a shoe store opening to the obscenity trial over Allen Ginsberg's "Howl," Perlman broke his leg skiing at Squaw Valley in 1957, an injury that laid him up for months. A good friend gave him a copy of "The Nature of the Universe" by British cosmologist Fred Hoyle.

A detective story would have been more welcome, Perlman recalled thinking, but by the time he had finished the pioneering science tome and was back on his feet, he was itching to find out what astronomers did all night. So he headed up to Mt. Hamilton just east of San Jose, home to the University of California's Lick Observatory and workplace of astronomer George Herbig.

"I said, 'What do you do for a living?'" Perlman recounted. "And he said, 'I'm interested in stars that are being born in the Orion nebula.' I've never forgotten that.... Stars getting born? It was kind of an epiphany."

In the 56 years that have followed, Perlman has written about the changing fields of astronomy, anthropology, archaeology and alternative energy. He's done stories on microbes, meteors, mammoths, mad cow disease, the Milky Way, the missing link.

He has covered disasters natural and man-made (earthquakes, tsunamis, oil spills) and spacecraft of all shapes and sizes (Voyager I and 2, Mariner 9, Galileo, Viking 1 and 2, Pathfinder, Sojourner, Messenger, Phoenix, rovers, Kepler, Hubble).

There was no such thing as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome when Perlman began covering science and medicine; he would go on to write more than 300 stories about the disease that broke his adopted city's heart.

Somewhere in his messy cubicle at Fifth Street and Mission he keeps a copy of his first AIDS story — among the earliest published, penned before the disease even had a name.

On June 5, 1981, the Centers for Disease Control ran an item about an outbreak of a mysterious lung ailment.

"In the period October 1980-May 1981, 5 young men, all active homosexuals, were treated for biopsy-confirmed Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia at 3 different hospitals in Los Angeles, California," the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report began. "Two of the patients died."

Perlman was a regular reader of the report. When he saw the piece, he immediately called Dr. Selma Dritz, assistant director of the communicable disease bureau at the San Francisco health department.

"Hey, is this happening here?" he asked. "Oh, yeah," Dritz said. "We've had maybe five cases too, which have not yet been reported to the MMWR."

The short article Perlman wrote was buried deep inside the June 6 paper: "A mysterious outbreak of a sometimes fatal pneumonia among gay men has occurred in San Francisco and several other major cities, it was revealed yesterday."

He didn't bother to put his byline on it. At the time, he said, the cases were "just a curiosity."

Twenty years later, his anniversary story about the "worst pandemic in modern history" cataloged the damage — "nearly 22 million people are now dead worldwide, and the count grows higher every day; more than 36 million humans are infected with the deadly virus but still alive."

In 2008, Perlman wrote Dritz's obituary.

Perlman has outlived colleagues he has written with, scientists he has written about, Anne, his wife of 61 years, who died in 2002. He is dating again. (In fact, at a recent wedding, he caught the bouquet.)

"I'm so lucky still to be able to do something, to do what I do.... I'm still pretty OK," he said. "Anyway, as long as they'll have me [at the Chronicle], I'll stick around."

Dr. J. Michael Bishop, chancellor emeritus at UC San Francisco and a winner of the 1989 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine, describes Perlman as "an iconic figure in American science writing." His curiosity is "insatiable," his energy "even at 94 is remarkable." Perlman, he said, "knows how to get to the essence of the science problem and explain that in terms that are clear to the general public."

Perlman's favorite kind of story is equal parts physical adventure, scientific discovery and opportunity to watch brilliant researchers at work.

He embarked on one such journalistic jaunt in 1977, the only reporter on board when the Galapagos Hydrothermal Expedition discovered deep-sea geysers 8,250 feet below the ocean's surface, 400 miles west of Ecuador.

Scientists on the research vessels Knorr and Lulu were pretty sure the vents would be surrounded by a barren, underwater desert. Instead, they found a wild habitat teeming with crabs, mussels and tall, white-stalked tube worms with bright red tops.

Perlman wrote his stories on a portable Olivetti typewriter. Using a Xerox telecopier scanner, the Knorr's radio operator sent the exclusive dispatches using a single-sideband radio to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Staffers there forwarded them to the Chronicle via Western Union.

"They have pinpointed geysers of hot water venting from fissures in fresh lava and sending warm plumes of brine shimmering upward into the near-freezing lower levels of the sea," Perlman wrote in a March 9, 1977, story whose headline boasted "Astounding Undersea Discoveries."

Woods Hole would later call it a "scientific discovery that changed the world."

On a much more recent adventure, Perlman camped in the Ethiopian desert with a team of fossil-hunting paleoanthropologists who would go on to discover and assemble the partial skeleton of a pre-human creature known as Ardipithecus ramidus — a.k.a. "Ardi" — who lived 4.4 million years ago.
The researchers were working in the Afar desert, the birthplace of humankind, a two-day drive from Addis Ababa. Daytime temperatures soared to triple digits. At night, tents were zipped against scorpions and venomous snakes.

The team was protected by guards toting AK-47s, Perlman wrote, "against whom or what was never clear — but huge lion paw prints spotted at one lunch site were clear hints of danger."

He was 88.

Thursday, December 01, 2011

About Geniuses

(Comments posted in Malaysia Today)

Geniuses are born out of the environment they live in and a product of their eco-system.

History has shown that humanity made significant leaps in the standard of living for most of its people only in the last 200 years or so, as a result of modern science and the Industrial Revolution.

In Asia, one only has to look back 3 generations or less. Before that, unless you are some 'tuans' (lords) most of the rest lived wretched lives no better than that of slaves or animals. [According to my father, my grandfather came to Malaya from China 100 years ago with only 1 shirt and a pair of pants. When he died, that was also all he left behind. Part of the cause was because he was an opium smoker]

Some historians estimated that modern technology enabled an average human today to live the life of one who had the equivalent of 30 to 40 slaves in the past. They averaged things out over all 6+ billion people (400 million in India today do not even have electricity). Those flying around on airplanes or proton cars for fun would appreciate that it would not be not possible 200 years ago without technology even if they tuaned (lorded) a million slaves.

[That's why supposedly god's son, god's agents etc. had god's permission to own female slaves but could not fly. Yes, all knowing and powerful gods cannot get their sons and agents to fly or make airplanes but ride donkeys, camels and slaves? And go around 'saving' others using wild animals with swords but no F15s and M1 Abrams? Send a battalion of those things out and those Romans and Sassanians would have submitted without a fight! Instead, one god’s bugger got nailed by a few Romans and suckers think it was a ‘great sacrifice’. Gods send messages without even paper, DVD or thumbdrive? That's why suckers that loudly extol those characters today are known as ‘idiots from the dark ages’]

The great leap in technology came about because of the development of rational thought (of which science and maths are the results) in place of ‘faiths’ in some parts of the world where people (along with some protestants) managed to free themselves from the feudal lords and religious idiots tuaning over them from places like Rome and due to the availability of a cheap information (and therefore knowledge) spreading technology called paper and printing.

Stephen Hawking in his book 'God created the Integers' listed 17 great mathematicians without whose breakthroughs today's advanced physics would not be possible. Of that,
- 2 came before the coming of a god's son (Euclid of Egypt, Archimedes of Sicily),
- 1 came before coming of a god's messenger (Diophantus of Egypt),
- 14 came after the arrival of paper & printing in Europe

Of the last 14, 4 were British, 4 French, 6 Germans. Can see the protestant link? German’s contribution was shorted by one because Hawking (a Brit) attributed Calculus to Newton and left out the German Liebniz whose symbols for Calculus we use today [the same way some people think Euclid and Diophantus were Greeks and not Egyptians].

That is one reason why the other animals gang up to whack the Germans. Out of the European 'sovereign debt crisis’ even those without history may notice signs of who the real big brother (and idiotic spoiler) of Europe today is.

[The concept of space-time curvature that many attribute to Einstein (and his Relativity) would not be possible without the geometry of Riemann, a German. Einstein was a German Jew who did not speak any Jewish language and whose dying words were in German. Some idiots from the dark ages today cite Einstein as proof that their religion is ‘the truth’ because his ‘genius’ supports their holy book’s claim that Jews are ‘god’s chosen people’. Einstein on the other hand said people who believe in personal gods are ‘child-like’ – see above for reason why]

In between the first 3 mathematicians and the others is a period of 1,200 years of little major mathematical progress. The period historians call 'the dark ages' falls within that gap.

During that gap, that part of the world was tuaned by 2 groups of people: feudal lords who settle things with swords and religious zealots who burnt disagreeable people on stakes.

[See what happened to Egypt since Diophantus? They went into deep freeze after the coming of some idiots]

With today’s Thievesland tuaned by thieves with crooked knives and a set of idiots from the dark ages, what chance do you think history would give a potential genius to bloom?

There is a higher chance that animals like Ibrahim Ali would do to them what the Anglo-Saxons did to the Germans…

Thursday, July 19, 2007

U Don't Know How Good Life is...?

Hi,

Thanks for the enlightening & humbling murals. It is not always 'U don't know how good your life is'. It may be 'U don't know how come your life is so good'

If we live a better life compared to those shown, it is because we had a luckier draw and stand on the shoulders and progresses accorded to us by some of the people before us and Science (plagiarised from Newton & others, honesty is the best policy).

Many are too unaware and arrogant to recognise that, and try to escape it by imagining it is blessings from their gods found via their great searches (see, it is all because of their own great discovering abilities)

As Zhou EnLai said of the Americans, they are a great people but they have no sense of history. You want to copy this?

As Isaac Asimov said, what have the church got to contribute to all the human progress we have around us the last few hundred years other than cheap words? (actually, also cheap stakes).

Before the advent of modern science and technology, most of the human race lived under difficult conditions. Except the ones at the top of the power pyramids who had the benefit of exploiting the ones below them.

This included the practice of slavery which was rampant throughout history. And the church said nothing about slavery (not the popes as slaves of god but men as slaves of the popes hor.)

Chinamen should know better, most of their forefathers lived that way up till the 20th century!

You don't find such honesty from the church. Perhaps, it's on an 'only god need to know' basis - like super-paedophile cases. Too big for the minds of god's copy, the Copygods.

Asimov lived in an America of Christ (like Chinamen of the same type, before Columbus 'found' it it was not hor) but the same applies whether you suck up to a mullah, monk or priest. Chinaman monks apply for the mail below - Dao or no Dao.

The Chinese has a saying Sou Zhu Dai Tu meaning to watch a tree to catch a rabbit.

The fable behind it is like this: One day a man saw a rabbit run into a tree and got knocked unconscious. So he took it home and had a good meal out of it. After that day, the stupid man attributed his easy catch to the tree and began to sit at the tree everyday waiting for the next catch.

Hah, sounds like Buddha? That Indian fella was a lucky sob too. He had an empire and could afford to sit at a tree waiting for inspiration. He might not have dead rabbits to contribute but he at least taught the world the concept of cause and effect. That's a few thousand years old history.
The Chinese rabbit fable is a few thousand years old too. And from some sharp Chinaman whose great insight speak of the kind of Chinamen I love to apply the dao to.

You see how accurate, despite its age, it is in describing human behaviour.

Just 4 characters, no need for a copius book n songs of copied hot air. Such economy of wisdom is of course unavailable to fools that has no need to copy from history and Chinamen's enlightenment. They don't need to stand on others' shoulders, only that one big fella's hot air.

Flying in the face of hot air sure beats all the kungfu Chinamen like the ones in Hidden Tiger, Crouching Dragon hor? Or was it Tiger Hide, Dragon Crotch? I don't hold old hot air well lah.

So if you want to bless this world, remember those hot air you suck in no can do.

But to be fair, what else do stupid but lucky Chinamen have to offer anyway, hor? Sou Zhu Dai Tu.

And for those that love to be images of super supremes: if you happen to be a heavenly perfect copy of Sou Zhu Dai Tu, it is just a work of those that preside over your heaven. Not your fault. Live with it, they work in copiously mysterious ways.


I thank the people from history
the great minds who were brave.


Torch bearers of rationality
sharp tearers of knave and rave
for a hand in my non-manifest destiny
for what I have without being a slave.

Ah-great-men, not Ah-men
is how I end my wondrous days
I do the reverse only when
I end my ponder of the foolish in daze...



This is just my simple poetry. Cannot compare to the likes of Rudyard Kipling's 'The White Man's Burden' where he exhorts the Americans to take up the 'challenge' and where Chinamen and likes star as 'half-devil, half-child'.



----- Original Message ----
From: Christopher Leong christopherleong2@yahoo.com.sg
To: Chee Khiaw Cheng cheekhiaw@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:10:17 PM
Subject: U don't know how good your life is..!


If you think you are unhappy, look at them
if you think your job is tough, how about him?
if you think your salary is low, how about her?

If you think you don't have many friends, ask yourself if you have one sincere friend...
you think study is a burden, how about her?

when you feel like giving up, think of this man
if you think you suffer in life, do you suffer as much as he does?
if you complaint about your transport system, how about them?
if your society is unfair to you, how about her?

"That which is beautiful is not always good; but that which is good is always beautiful"

xxx

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Where the Earth is ....

Hi,

Thanks for the nice pictures. Hopefully, people get a small picture of where we stand in the context that the gods deal with.

Note that the comparison herein is just one between a few stars & planets, a comparison of entities in the sub-virus dimension to the gods' realm. Probably meant to aid the less imaginative super-submini-viruses who cannot 'see' despite their claimed 'great searches'.

And note that those are 'balls' we are dealing with hor, not flat discs unlike what some supposedly god inspired fellas no less than the Pontiffs (and their predecessors the Pontifex Maximus and likes) insisted for a few thousand years till Copernicus, Galileo and the likes (commonly known as the 'heretics' then) enlightened them otherwise. And only after a few of the latter's predecessors were burnt off by the former for 'lack of respect'.

There are many ways to show how these fellas lack depth - this flat out missing out of 1 entire godly dimension is just one of the more obvious ones.

Only after that, of course, did Columbus and the likes dared to sail beyond the horizon and started the phenomenon known as colonialism with people like Chinamen, Indians, Africans and more starring as sub-humans to be enlightened, in more ways than one (is that why we are doing this?).

That's also why you don't find Chinamen 'finding' the god of Rome until the last couple of centuries (the converse is also true, but we have a smaller bubble there to burst).

Useless Chinamen hor? So many centuries cannot find the 'true god', must wait for Columbus, Jesuits & likes.

Or if you choose to protest, you of course have to thank the presumptious Germans who ended up getting whacked in the World Wars and that English king who wanted to dump the Spanish King's relative to have another woman - all of which was against the Pope's inspired choice (political and not divine hor).

So inspiring, such histories...

Aiyah, these are all history of course and boh pakai claimed some Chinamen who at the same time draw inpsiration from some low-end fiction from further back in history.

In the order of the universe of the gods, the biggest star you see here would be no where near a pixel. So it takes a lot of bull & balls for some people to claim they are special to the gods, doesn't it?

If it is this super-submicro-virus, I'd stay real low. But I think the others get away with it because the gods really don't give such trivialities a damn - regardless of whether the claimed sub-virus-to-god communications are done weekly or 5 times a day, at-meal or off-meal.

Thanks to science, their huge egoistical bubbles are now big flat discs unlike what their predecessors held so dear- what with all the hot air taken out.

Hey, certain books say that life came into being when the gods gave some clay mixture some of their 'breathe'. Hot air, in earthly speak. Indeed ...

Rgds
CCK


Forwarded Message

From: "Tham, Louis Tuck Peng" Louis.Tham@sg.standardchartered.com
To: Chee Khiaw Cheng cheekhiaw@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:58:53
Subject: FW: Where the Earth is ....

something that you are already aware of.. and has been discussing....

now the visual representation. i think the last pic explain the physical significance of earth where the sun is represented only by a pixel...

Now, THIS is really fascinating - I've never really given this any thought whatsoever, but it's rather dazzling to see it is presented this way.

I certainly thought this was enlightening. Didn't even realize we knew much beyond our sun .... It's a big universe.
































































Antares is the 15th brightest star in the sky. It is more than 1000 light years away.

So... See how insignificant we really are, in this heavenly arrangement of the Almighty but still we have a place, space & very well known existence.

So Friends....make your stay on this planet, a really worth while.

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Oceanic Disasters

Hi all,

Pls refer to articles in link below.

They are long and you need to register (free). If you think good things are never free and only money buy you value I suggest you read the articles to see if you get value from them - science is free, it had been since the Popes gave up on burning the fellas that started it off - the Popes did not do that for free though.

It is about the great changes in the oceans around us. Like some of the scientists quoted in here, I also used to think that the great oceans that cover 70% of the earth's surface and holding more than 95% of all the water on earth would be the last place to suffer from our actions. I was not wrong. It was the last to suffer, just that it is much sooner than I thought.

Like a researcher was quoted, the next generation parents will be asking their children to eat their jellyfish, and not their fish. And chinamen that are now having jellyfish as appetisers and fish as main course will find their children having them the other way round - that is if they survive long enough.

The worst culprits are those living in the so-called developed countries, for obvious reasons. Moi in Singapore is one of them.

We have no hope if you still can't get this after reading the articles in the link. I personally have little for I know how many simpletons there are living in these places hitch-hiking on science and abusing the use of its 'products' under the guise of 'first world ingenuity' while conveniently thinking it is their god-given right or blessings, as some of them call it.

Hah, talking about blessings. I once a while get notes from such people telling the gods to bless me and everything else - huh, what god-instructors these presumptuous simpletons are. They think that what we get, do or consume (what we destroy not counted of course) are blessings from the gods!

That is convenient because they could not figure out why their lives are so good (never mind if they had used their fathers' money to buy those 'passports', that's just god's blessings). They probably also think that their god-instructing exhortations or incantations would save the world from their stupid actions too!

With them around, we have little hope....



Below link contains a very good 5-part report titled Altered Oceans on reports of significant changes happening in our oceans (esp. around the US) in the last few decades suspected to be caused by environmental contamination caused by actions of man:


http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans-series,0,7842752.special

xxx

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Comparative Value of a Dinosaur Brain

The term ‘dinosaur’ was coined by a biologist named Richard Owen sometime in the mid 19th century and it apparently means ‘terrible lizard’ in some language I am not familiar with. Richard Owen was apparently ‘an extraordinarily clever scientist’ and was ‘the leading comparative anatomist of his day’.

According to historians, people in the ‘west’ did not come up with the idea nor accept the existence of dinosaurs till then because the concept of an animal going extinct was not in line with their ‘great book’ which claims among others that this world was created for man and had been unchanging since the ‘great creation’. The ‘great creation’ according to that little book could be dated to be anything from 6,000 years ago to many many more years than that (these fellas with their ‘words of god’ at their finger tips could not finger when such an important event in the scheme of things actually took place!)

[Side Note:
For some background on the 6,000 year old ‘theory’, read my article on ‘Brief History of Dating’ to be out soon]

On the other hand, the Chinese is known to have records of dinosaur fossils for a few thousand years and grind them up for use as medicine. That may also be the origin of their concept of the ‘dragon’ – hey, China men like the others mentioned here do have a great sense of imagination.

We shall however stay with the history of the west for it is a lot more enlightening and funnier because of their ‘dedication’ to that particular little book for a good 2 millenia. Like some Asiatic simpletons I know today, people in that part of the world could not, up to that time, get themselves to accept anything not in line with concepts contained in that book.

[Side note:
For the same reason, they insisted (among many equally stupid concepts obvious to almost all China men today, simpletons included) that the sun and all the other celestial bodies went round the earth – whatever for, it was at least an ego boosting concept for these fellas. To be fair, according to modern science they were not 100% wrong. You see, according to the Big Bang theory every thing is moving away from the earth (the closest to the ‘earth-centric’ claim science can attest for these supposedly god enlightened simpletons). Since everything is moving away from earth, perhaps we can arguably say that earth is at the ‘center’ and therefore ‘special’? But then, Big Bang also says that everything is moving away from everything else. So, if we apply the same simplistic logic, the other celestial bodies should also be ‘special’. Wah, everything also special? In that case, could that include China men like me who claim no special links to Rome or other less earthly entities created by some people’s ego-boosting imaginations? Lucky me, no need for the other Chinamen to ‘bless me’ through Rome]

Things apparently started in the 18th century thanks to (who other than) the Americans. It started when some Americans found a large bone more than a meter in length in the land named after a Spanish fella called Amerigo Vespucci who had claimed the land for his Spanish King and his 'Lord' to no avail for the British had other ideas and were guided by a different divine force that proved to be more superior.

[Side note:
The ‘Americans’ above were not really Americans but British who by then had whacked the real British who in turn had earlier whacked and chased the Spanish down south. The Spanish had earlier whacked the real Americans including the Incans, Aztecs and Mexicans. If you think this is a case of what goes around comes around, you are wrong. The real Americans the Spanish whacked were not the same as the Americans of this story. According to some, the former were ‘red Indians’ who were not the same as the ‘non-red Indians’ in Asia which almost confuses the hell out of me. Conspiracy theory at work?]

When the first dinosaur bone was found, the Americans involved decided to send it to some supposed experts in Europe for study - apparently, at that time America was considered third world compared to its ‘big brothers’ in Europe. Of course, there were no dinosaur experts then. But there were well respected doctors of ‘anatomy’ of other kinds. And as it went, the experts to whom the bone was dispatched summarily declared it as nothing but just the leg bone of some over sized elephant. To them, the possibility of the bone belonging to a large specie entirely new to them and that had gone extinct did not cross their minds because their ‘great book’, if we had not forgotten, did not allow for it.

However, it did help the cause of ‘dinosaurship’ that at about the same time there happened to be some sort of a spat between the Americans and some ‘arrogant’ French fellas who claimed that all things American were inferior to ‘great’ Europe.

[Side note:
The British of which the Americans were part of had been vying with the French to be the ‘boss’ of Europe for hundreds of years which also explains why they like me also, foolishly some China men may say, don’t believe in the divinity of the pope and Rome. And today, if you believe George Bush, it is the reverse – the French is now part of the ‘Old World’, the reason being their unwillingness to whack the Afghans and Iraqis with Bush (and not because they follow the pope). But what about the pope, is he new or old world? Cheap thrill?

One America-is-inferior example given by the French then was the ‘natives’ in America had smaller male genitalia, and less body hair – if this sounded like China men too you are not far off, the ‘west’ then also considered Africans and Asians uncivilized and sub-humans to be ‘saved’ through Christianisation. In fact, in exhorting the Bush-type Americans to ‘take up the responsibility’ and ‘annex’ the Philippines after they (the Americans and not British) have whacked the Spaniards in the late 19th century, the English poet Rudyard Kipling (that some China men of ‘literature’ may be familiar with) famously called these other people ‘the White man’s burden’ - which explains why some China men are so proud they have some claim to the big ‘C’ or whatever little minor role in it. Lesser beings should always try to be a lesser burden to anyone, not just the white man.]


Apparently the French claim pissed off a certain Thomas Jefferson (who by then had considered himself ‘American’) enough for him to dispatch an expedition into the American hinterland to search for proof that things American are indeed ‘bigger’ and therefore greater than ‘old Europe’.

[Side Note:
Jefferson felt insulted because like his ‘puritan’ forefathers he believed that they were creating ‘a shining city upon the hill’ (copied from a certain Sermon of the Mount in their little book) that will be a shining example to the ‘Old World’ (you are right, idiot Bush could not have come up with this term himself) and guide the ‘decadent’ Europeans to ultimate ‘redemption’.

On the other hand, the Holy Alliance (which meant almost the whole of continental Europe listening to the various popey ones based in Rome and other places like Moscow) who saw this as part of these fellas on-going 'protests' then wanted to whack the audacious Americans for their claim to greater divinity. In any case, the Holy Alliance ‘lost’ in this case thanks to the greater powers of the British Protestant guns compared to those allied to the popes. You see, arguments of divinity are always won by the power of the sword or gun – that’s how respect is gained by such people. Those who wish protest about this little observation better get some firepower behind them, divinity has no use without such powers.

In this context, some Australians as example are quite smart – they live in Anglo-Saxon run Australia but also submit to Rome. A classic case of ‘if you are not sure hedge your bets’. But surprisingly, they don’t believe in Krishna, Kuan Yin and Mohammad lah. Ha, a ‘partial hedge’ only, what silly fellas…]


Thomas Jefferson was of course expecting the expedition to find live samples of super-large elephants. To his dismay, the expedition did not return with over-sized live elephants. But they did bring back loads more of those big bones. This time, the bones included that from the other parts of the dinosaur’s anatomy.

[Side Note:
As Steve Irwin enthusiasts would know, there is no elephants in America. The gods work in strange ways, to quote certain people. Asia and Africa have elephants and sub-humans but Rome and the west have the ‘great book’ and popey ones, and forever the twines shall never meet – according to the same Kipling fella. For the same reason, that perhaps explains why there was no China man pope.]

So, as it went, as they collected more and more of those ‘big bones’ and slowly pieced them together, the entire ‘west’ slowly began to realize that those bones were not from any animal living then. Among them was a 'notable expert’ by the name of Dr Gideon Mantell - the term ‘paleonthologist’ was not coined yet (the gods would not divulge such things ahead of their time?).

By the mid 19th century our Richard Owen had ‘hijacked’ the works of people like Mantell, and came up with the term ‘dinosaur’ (history is full of hijacking stories – see Virgin Fathers for some examples http://cckplanetblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/virgin-fathers.html).

How not to? Put those bones together and instead of long thick nose trunks, these things had long thick tails unknown to all them ‘enlightened’ fellas – even their greatest boatman that saved the entire earth in one super-boat never mentioned these different-tail things in that great flood tale! (read the Story of Nolah)

And that was how we got animals like Tyranosaurus and a whole lot of other sauruses that I cannot remember – ha, may be that is also why their great boat-man Nolah missed these animals out of his great flood tale (such undivine characteristics like mine, not impressive at all hor?).

But one particular Stegosaurus I do remember for its comparative value. Apparently, the Stegosaurus grew to a height of 10m but had a brain the size of a walnut (if you don’t believe this you go dig for the bones in America lor – we know for sure you cannot get such ‘details’ from one particular ‘great book’).

Some say that would make the Stegosaurus a really big and stupid animal. When I read that, I wondered how on earth those people figured that out. Then Richard Owen’s ‘leading comparative anatomist’ idea came to my mind.

Perhaps, these people thought that since humans are so god-like (and therefore should be ‘most smart’), anything with brain size smaller than the human’s would therefore be more stupid than human. What more if, as we can also prove from the various histories of such god-like animals, there are indeed very stupid humans with brain sizes much bigger than a walnut.

Oh gods, what size are yours that they so proudly compare their little ones to?

Perhaps I should write about the size of your Universe another day just to have some fun together…not with you the gods who surely don’t need my little fun stories, but with all those who wish to understand the limited powers of the little human brain.

[Side Note:
Richard Owen had originally enjoyed a working relationship with the younger Charles Darwin, but having been a devout Christian from the beginning, Owen saw creation as a series of experiments by a Creator, and he was outraged by Darwin's masterwork On the Origin of Species.

Mr Owen probably thought that dinosaurs were just one big godly experiment went wrong and terminated by the gods. What made Mr Owen so cock-sure he was the right experimental result of god-play, only the gods know. That is also why present day Asiatic co-believers of Mr Owen, who would otherwise not be able to tell a stegosaurus brain’s size from that of a tyrannosaurus but is as cock-sure as Mr Owen of their god-like features nevertheless, is the perennial feature in my own little ‘crusade’ to prove that their brains although bigger than a walnut is nowhere near god-like.

It is proving to be a piece of cake, which also happens to be bigger than the size of the human’s brain.
]

Thursday, July 29, 2004

Another Man the Gods Can Talk To

(report on death of Francis Crick, one of 2 scientists that discovered DNA and the double helix)
http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040729/05


The life of another great mind that helped mankind understand a little bit more of Nature's laws had come to pass. While people like me may mourn their passing, the comfort we draw from this is now at least when the Gods have some time on their hands and want to share their thoughts a bit, they have at least one more soul that can at least talk some sense with Them.

Unlike the other idiots who only want to crowd around Them but can only repeat like broken records the words from the one book supposedly written by Them - which if true, They will obviously not be interested in!

Who wants some parrot to repeat the words one had written thousands of years ago, hor?

Monday, July 26, 2004

Mousy Ideas

There are people who believe that this entire existence is created for them who were made specially by the Creators in the image of the Creators themselves.

To support that believe, a common example cited by these people, in what seems so obvious to them (unlike people like me), is the number of things 'created' by humans and thus how humans 'control everything around us'.

Thus, we have people like those in this article who think they had 'created' something new which therefore belongs to them (that's what patenting means if you are new to this game).

They thus think that they have the right to milk other humans for it (that's the only thing patenting facilitates if you are new to the history of the last century.)

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040726/03

However, what these people refuse (or try to avoid) to accept is that all they had done was discovered and played with the rules of Nature.

Admittedly, that's not a feat that other creatures or life-forms are capable of, thus the arrogance that gave rise to some people's believe that began a couple of thousand years ago (if you know what humans were capable of a couple of thousand years ago, that is a huge dose of supreme idiotic arrogance!).

If anything, all these certain humans had done is observed, analysed, understood and tweaked the way Nature is (and will always be till kingdom come, er, or for some idiots, till their king come again).

Another way of putting it is that the mouse that those people 'created' will not exist if the rules of Nature do not allow it. They had not created anything new, they merely tweaked Nature so that it expresses Itself in a new way (in the form of a new mouse). They can do that as long as they stay within the boundaries of Nature's laws.

What the other humans are saying is that hey we might have discovered a way of manipulating one aspect of Nature but we do not understand at all what its long term effects are on the entire eco-system on Earth (Earth only, a small speck in Nature's creation, hor). So, recognise but don't give exclusive rights to such discoveries if we cannot determine its effects (for those unGodlike ones that don't understand patenting, patent laws, not Nature's laws hor, require anyone who try to use, replicate, reproduce a method or outcome to get permission, after paying royalty, from their 'creators' before doing so. Hey, some people are more godlike than others?).

Another way of looking at this is this. Telling me that you have discovered that pressing a green button on a machine causes it to spit fire is fine and good but what the hell is the machine also doing? If we don't know, we had better make sure anyone that wants to take a look at the machine be allowed to do so without having to get permission from that guy that is pressing the green button.

If those people were to be more concerned about what effect their 'creations' will have on Nature as opposed to making more money through their patents, we would have less quibble.

But then, if that happens, there will be a lot less reason$ to be arrogant humans - which is very unGod-like for many followers of those supreme idiot$ from a few millenia ago....


Patents for Idiots:

Modern medicine and patenting started when some money hungry idiots realised that they could have made tonnes of money if they had laid their hands on what people like Fleming & Louis Pasteur discovered.

They now call those idiots' ideas capitalism & free market, and I can show you many an idiot that will swear by the greatness of these ideas. Over the last decade or so, the chief practitioner of these ideas, the US, had been trying to help the world progress along by doing a few things:

1. accord rights to the person who register any new discovery with their patent office regardless of whether the process or method had in fact been in use already. That means that one can steal an idea from another if that other is not fast or greedy enough to patent it. A good example are all the traditional cures from all cultures around the world which is why countries from Brazil, to South Africa, to India and China are up against them.

2. to extend the duration for patent rights especially medicine to 25 years from present 10-15 year (based on millenia old concept of the longer you milk the fatter you get)

3. doing bilateral agreements outside of the WTO to get other countries to agree on the above arrangements outside the know of the common people.

Some of you like me may wonder why smart people like Fleming and Pasteur are so dumb as not to come up with those same ideas. Such great minds usually don't do something for a good reason. Perhaps they understand that making money and milking others is like pressing a green start button on a fire spitting machine in a house of cards. Within Nature's laws and human-like, but perhaps undesirable and unGod-like.

But then the smarter capitalist idiots ask: how do we know for sure something is not so good? If we don't, we cannot judge and therefore should not change or stop others from doing something. It is within each individual's so-called 'rights' to do what they want, as long as it is done on a willing buyer willing seller basis. But if that's the case, why force (in some cases by killing) others to pay royalty, practice capitalism, stop selling WMDs to others, and so on?

Hah, those are different things entirely for those who don't do that are evil empires... sounds familiar?

Tuesday, May 11, 2004

Where are Thee, My Fella Nolah?

The world has lost and will continue to lose its natural heritage because of actions by supposed decendents of the great fella Nolah. Despite all their proclaimed God-like nature (albeit borne out of incest), man has yet to recognise that. Let alone control their actions & behaviours to stop/reverse the trend.

As a result, people like me really wish that our great Nolah fella can do an encore of his great feats. Then I'll be really impressed. But the 'smarter' Nolah-likes always say I cannot tell their Big Boss & Nolah what & when to do things otherwise I will be the Big Boss. Smart logic but other than say 'have faith lah' what better idea or solution to this
destruction do these 'smarter' Nolah-likes have? If history is any indication, not for another 2 thousand years at least!

By then bye bye to more life forms. But the good news is that any future Nolah need only to build a small tubby boat which won't need a hundred years to build. Unlike our poor last fella (may be the kinder Big Boss took pity on our last fella).

Just mere passing knowledge....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3700079.stm

p.s. anyone interested in getting a copy of my cheap bible on Nolah can request through e-mail to http://us.f416.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=cheekhiaw@yahoo.com&YY=29333&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b

Saturday, January 31, 2004

Who to Blame for Bird Flu?

According to the New Scientist, they suspect this year’s bird flu started in China as a result of a mass vaccination exercise gone sour when chickens in China were vaccinated following a bird flu epidemic in Hong Kong a few years ago. The Chinese government denied the allegation and strongly protested the irresponsible reporting of the weekly.

Those of us aware of the Story of Nolah would understand why the Chinese government may have a case. You see, according to the Nolah-likes, there is no such thing as evolution. Every thing that exists around us had been there since the beginning when God created everything and Nolah’s family were the only humans saved from a later ‘big flood’ by our fella Nolah himself.

So, Chinamen must be descendants of Nolah’s incestuous family and should therefore be preceded by the bird flu virus which existed from the very beginning. Of course, this assumes the following:

1. that Chinamen are humans.
Since we know many Chinamen claim they are Nolah-likes, Chinamen must be humans (anyone want to ‘arg’ with that? How about you Dolahs out there?)

2. the concepts of time and precedence holds true in Nature all the time.
Since the Nolah storybook did not say that these concepts are false, we have no basis to think so (this is the logic of IBBDNSSCSSL or ‘if Boss’ Book did not say so, cannot say so lah’). In addition, if time and precedence do not ‘pakai’, the New Scientist has no basis to be sure China’s vaccinations a few years ago caused the bird flu now.

There you have it, the New Scientist is wrong to blame the flu on the Chinese. Someone else is responsible but we can be sure it is not the Chinamen. I really give up on those ‘scientist’ fellas. They never accept such simple and neat explanations to things. And those silly fools are still mucking around everyday trying to find so-called ‘vaccines’ which they claim are slightly mutated and less fatal/virulent versions of the actual virus that they think when injected into humans will cause their bodies to produce anti-bodies against the actual culprit. (If you wonder why those stupid scientists should not waste time on that, it’s because mutation is the cornerstone of evolution and that’s not possible according to our Nolah-likes. Which is why when those Nolah-likes have a flu they don’t go to the scientists but go to the doctor! Hey, there’s a lot of difference, OK.)

By the way, how come Chinamen look different from other in-bred descendents of Nolah if there is no such thing as evolution? Aw, silly question, only fools say they are different. The only thing different is their names but even then it is just the ‘unimportant hind part’ where you find irrelevant terms like ‘Tan Ah Kow’ and ‘Chin Ah Beng’. And if you focus on the ‘most important’ front part of their names (you know, front means most important according to the precedence theory), they are all the same.

No? Let’s not quibble over that.

Actually, I left this out from our Nolah story. Once when an off-spring pair of Nolah was practicing their incestual kung fu, the father over-did the hops and chases. Which was why the mother over-heated. Which was why the Negroes were overcooked black and their hair permed. That also explains why Negros run and jump better than other humans (you better be able to run fast for the air cooling to work).

The Indians were luckier, their parents were either less enthusiastic or discovered Yoga to cool themselves down. So their mother’s temperature was lower and Indians only black but hair no perm.

The Caucasians were conceived while their parents were holidaying in the North Pole where the colder weather compensated for the mother's over-heating, and they liked the color of the polar bear.

And the Chinamen? Hah, this one more high tech! Their parents were holidaying in a region known as the Yellow Sea which is in between North Pole and India, so color also in between. They also discovered plastic surgery that they employed to pull back the skin just behind the eyes of their kids to produce the slit eyes! And since they liked the Indian’s straight black hair they transplanted some of those to their children.

Tuesday, January 27, 2004

What a Great Feat!

(attached link to BBC new report on landing of 2nd Nasa probe on Mars)

Reading this news item is really enlightening. And it reminds me of what Issac Assimov once said. It was something along this line.

In thousands of years of human history, religions had only words to offer the world - telling us how great each religion is, the feats/miracles their idols had done, and what great future mankind will have if we follow their words. But what history had proved is that the world had progressed little when those religious fellas were in charge, and all the progress
mankind made only came about in the last couple of hundred years of modern science and medicine, and rational thoughts (by the way, one faithful once told me he is not sure if rational thought is the way to look at the world. Then I say why do we think God gave our brains to us? All that just to be able read one book and say faith is all you need?)

I also remember a few favourite claims of a certain religion:
- that this entire existence is created for humans
- some of their idols can do miracles like parting the sea.

Of course, they have a hard time convincing people like me. For one, if this existence is for man's pleasure, then what the heck had those religious faithfuls been doing all this while? Of all such people I have the opportunity to know, it was nothing. Ziltch. They know nuts of even the simplest of astronomy! They send around chain mails with quotes from their one book (the only one they really read, I suspect) but I had never seen anything from them admiring real life accomplishments like that in the news article above (perhaps they think those were all cheap thrills or conspiracies to bluff fools like me!)

Secondly, if those idols of theirs were so great why didn't they pass on their skills to their millions of current day faithfuls? (I know some of these fellas are damn sure they are faithfuls!). Then, they won't have to do much convincing. No, they didn't. Perhaps the truth is more like those Chinese swordfighting novels where the masters fight and die trying to keep their 'kung fu skills' from all and since then foolish chinamen had been fantasising about flying through air and blowing up things with a wave of their hands? I mean, can you imagine how 'green' this world would have been if those chinese kung fu masters had passed their skills to us? We would not need cars, ships and planes. Heck, we don't even need WMDs! (I can never stop laughing when I think about these kung fu movies!)

That notwithstanding, given the scale of the world around us, parting sea is small trick for supposedly godlike super humans. I mean if these fellas' book tell me that one of their idols went universe hopping with his bunch of followers and he parted a few galaxies along the way, then I say, hey may be that was something. But no, these fellas didn't even know how to make a telescope to look at the moon & sun until our friend Galileo came along. And they even had the gall to call Galileo a liar!

So now, which do you think is a greater feat? Writing stories about parting seas (or kung fu masters, depending on which is your fancy) or sending probes to Mars?